🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has claimed to have scraped a vast number of songs from the popular streaming service and is preparing to publish them online.

Potential Boost for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers said the apparent data breach could aid AI companies looking for material to train their technology.

An entity called Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and record names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not constitute its entire catalog.

“We have identified and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” said a company representative.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorised access found a external actor scraped public metadata and employed illicit methods to bypass DRM protections.

Archive's Stated Mission and Concerns

Spotify does not think the music acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They asserted the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of exchanging large digital files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

AI Training and Copyright Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ copyright, said the leaked music would likely be used for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on illegally sourced data is unfortunately widespread in the tech sector, so this accessed music is almost certain to end up instructing AI models,” he stated.

The group's website alludes to LibGen, a huge online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been used by Meta to develop its systems.

The co-founder of an AI startup posted on LinkedIn that members of the public could in theory “create their own personal free equivalent of the service”. He said it could also enable tech companies to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Copyright has emerged as a battleground between artists, writers and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Considerations and Responses

Across Britain, creative professionals have protested against a government proposal to let AI companies utilize protected work without permission unless the rights holder opts out. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, research and development informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The government has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.